The situation in Russia

MB Communications in Winnipeg received the following fax in late November, which gives some early information on what effect the new law to restrict religious activities in Russia is having.

On Nov. 21, I was at a conference in the office of the Russian-American Association for Spiritual Renewal. More than 100 pastors came together to pray. The main agenda was to organize an evangelical association to act as an umbrella for all Protestant religious organizations and evangelical churches.

Today in some cities the evangelical churches are being closed because they are considered "sects". For example, on Saturday, Nov. 22, I got a call from pastor Serge Belov. He asked for prayer for his church. Officials cancelled an agreement with them for space they had˙20rented. They are Baptist, and they were accused of being a "sect".

Another example: A pastor related that in the city of Rostov a big billboard shows one man beating another. Under the picture are the words: "Let's beat all Baptists, Pentecostals, Adventists....All are sects!" That is what our new religion law has already created!

We sent our Christian programs to eight radio stations recently. Several days ago, a priest from Saxalin called us asking questions such as: Who are you? For whom do you work? Which denomination do you belong to? When we spoke with the head of the radio station in Blagoveshensk, he said they have received our tapes, but he was going to give them to a local priest for approval; only then will he air them.

We are praying about our contacts with radio stations. At this time, we have not received any negative responses from radio producers about our programs. In our studio, we continue to do˙20what we always do. Thank you for praying for us. We wish all of you a Blessed Christmas. Leonid Sergienko,
Russian Program Producer, MB Communications

A dose of reality

Re John Redekop's "Christians and the Police" (Oct. 24): Tremendous damage could be done in the church if each of us were to air our disillusioning experiences with authority figures (police, pastors, professors or parents). If we then compare them with their cross-cultural parallels, we stand doubly apart, like the one who prayed in the temple, "Thank You, God, that I'm not like. . . ." We are all sinners--none greater or lesser.

Redekop should take a more humble view of the world.

Nellie Taylor, (E)
Abbotsford, B.C.

E-mail needs to be read

I enjoyed "My Dear E-mail Recipient" (Oct. 24). E-mail has been a boon to my business and to encouraging one another. I have found it a good "confessional box" (but the recipients should be wisely chosen).

I lost my sister in a car accident Oct. 21. I sent e-mail to all in the church. Unfortunately, some did not read it, so condolences were a little late in coming. Many messages are entertaining,˙20but some need quick attention. I urge readers to check their mail daily if possible. They do not˙20need to reply, but at least they can be informed of such tragedies and other needs for encouragement.

Gord Mathison, (E)
Langley, B.C.

More dos for youth pastors

Tony Kesler's comments on training youth pastors (Aug. 29) were extremely relevant. David Wiebe's sidebar on expectations was incisivewith several necessary additions:

Do not expect the youth pastor, any more than the Christian school, to make up for parenting deficits, to fix the teen who is out of control.

Do expect the youth pastor, if he does not have the necessary skills for his job, to say so, to seek to increase his abilities and/or to seek out gifted and trained people with whom to work.

Do expect the youth pastor to establish a friendly working relationship with parents and other ministries in the church.

D. Stewart, (E)
Vancouver, B.C.

Protecting the family reconsidered

In "Focussing on the family" (June 27), John Redekop outlines five "attacks" on the family. His arguments should not go unchallenged.

The first "attack" is federal tax legislation that favours dual income over single income families. It's not fair to label this legislation an attack on the family since it seems to stem from a concern for the welfare

of a family that is forced to have both parents working full-time. Under appropriate circumstances, daycare and other costs should be subsidized to help maintain the "fabric of our society" that Redekop is so anxious to defend.

The second "attack" is that only "children in broken homes are eligible for educational support payments after age 18". Doesn't it make sense that these children, who are victims of their parents' actions, should get some breaks in their lives? Does Redekop really believe that this legislation encourages parents to divorce?

The third, fourth and fifth "attacks" relate to the growing prominence of homosexuality in our society. Redekop concludes that by promoting homosexuality as normal, the traditional family is being attacked. The truth is that it is homosexuals that continue to be˙20attacked in our society, whether through verbal assaults or denial of basic human rights, such as˙20the right to employment. There is much more of a negative social stigma attached to being gay than there is to being a married Christian couple with a family.

Redekop's assertion that the British Columbia Teachers Federation is "assaulting" heterosexuality is an exaggeration. The BCTF's stand seems to stem from a concern to protect individual students from extreme homophobic attitudes. Redekop's argument is the equivalent of a white person in the American South claiming that seeking equal˙20rights for black people is an attempt to undermine the rights of white people.

Additionally, Redekop argues that just because homosexual tendencies may be considered natural, it does not necessarily mean that they are good. He then lists tendencies that would be˙20considered sinful: pedophiles, sex with teenagers, murder, thieves, arsonists, suicidal people, bestiality, necrophilia. All of these are felonies that would disgust 99% of our population. The homosexual tendency is not criminal. Redekop could have made his point in a much more˙20sensitive manner without resorting to such unfair connotations.

We live in times where it's far too easy to remain in our ideological/theological camps without making the effort to dialogue with the other side. Clearly, the issue of homosexuality˙20won't go away, and both sides of the debate have a tendency to fuel the fire with incendiary˙20language and simplistic distortions. We, as Christians, should not be contributing to the polarization and hatred that often occurs between heterosexuals and homosexuals. The church needs to make more of an effort to understand homosexuals, their needs and the deep scars they carry as outcasts in society. If a church focusses only on traditional families, these who don't fit into that grouping--singles, single parents and homosexuals (even if they are not practising)--will feel excluded and misunderstood. "Protecting the family" should be within the context of reaching out to all in our community.

Dale Enns, (E)
Nakatsugawa, Gifu, Japan

The lord looks at the heart

Re "Refocusing Your Church" (Oct. 24): When do we quit using our own strategies and start letting God direct us? In those articles, God was mentioned very few times.

One statement says "Leadership is committed to motivating and empowering the church to accomplish a God-given future direction (vision)." If it is God-given, is it leader-driven? Maybe we should read the prophets again. The priests (church leaders) were˙20convinced they were doing everything the way God wanted. But God said "I will not listen to them" (Ezekiel 8:18). God had to use prophets to tell the people the truth about˙20God. Because the message of the prophets didn't fit into the church leaders' strategy, the prophets˙20were killed.

We must focus on God--not on leaders. Any leader who truly loves God will not mind this in the least. Brad Huebert, in his letter "What I didn't learn in Bible school" (Oct. 24), seems to be heading in the right direction. We need more people in our churches who realize that programs are not the answer to our spiritual needs. Let's stop fooling ourselves by˙20thinking that pastors can make the church healthy. Only God can do that. At best, pastors can˙20allow God to work in their churches and be good examples of what it means to be a˙20"servant" of the Lord.

Anne Wagner, (E)
London, Ont.

Not of this world

"Refocussing the Church" (Oct. 24) seems to be a well-developed strategy for the revitalization of the institution of the Mennonite Brethren Church. It appears to draw upon sociologial studies of the church and provide the church with an opportunity to make strategic˙20decisions which will enable the Kingdom of God to expand.

And then I hear Jesus say, "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36) and "The kingdom of God does not come visibly" (Luke 17:21).

May Your kingdom come, O God. May we be faithful workers in Your kingdom. But forgive us for thinking it is our job to devise strategies to expand Your kingdom.

Leonard Wiens,
Chilliwack, B.C.

Insightful and timely

I have appreciated your magazine over the years. I am preparing for ministry, and I have found the articles insightful and timely. The magazine is a quality production that serves a definitive role in our denomination.

Michael Penninga, (E)
Langley, B.C.


Return to the M.B.Herald Vol. 36, No. 23 Home Page