Letters to the Editor

Non-violence not preached

I am one of the increasing number of non-Mennonites who are welcomed into membership and appreciate the theology of the MB faith. Not once have I heard non-violence mentioned from the pulpit or in our adult Bible classes. Rev. H. Baerg, when leading a care group, spoke strongly of God not being a pacifist, but a God of strength and justice as well as love. Personally, I have lived 70-odd years without violence, have never been in a physical fight and have never seen a dead body, save in caskets.

I have no trouble with Mr. Fehr's position (Oct. 23) and think it a most worthy stance. However, I think there is more to Remembrance Day than reminders of violence—the acknowledgement that we are free to worship without interference as a direct result of the death of tens of thousands of men and women in two World Wars.

My father voluntarily served overseas 1914-1918 and suffered for 50 years. My namesake, Fred Hill, a vibrant Christian, was killed on Christmas Day, 1917 in France. My school chum is buried in Germany. My pal was shot down over the North Sea, shielding one of his crew with his body for days before rescue. Five boys from my Sunday school class died; one accepted Christ in Italy and asked me to be proxy when he joined the church.

Am I not to be thankful and remember that Christ was the Supreme Sacrifice? I will wear my poppy, give thanks and remember.

Fred Hill Bryant,
Chilliwack, B.C.

Thanks for Herald

Thank you for the informative Herald. It challenges and encourages me to keep seeking God in my daily activities. It also continues to encourage me to not to be so material-focussed but to focus on things that will last for eternity.

Pam Wedel,
Kelowna, B.C.

Cling to God's Word

I thank God for you and for His mercy, love and divine Word. I read the Aug. 28 editorial and then looked to my Bible for answers.

I have always believed that homosexuality is a sin, and yet Satan continues to cloud the issue with lies and confusion. Salvation in Jesus Christ is given through the confession of sin. In order to confess one's sins, they must first be recognized as sin.

Lynn Dyckman (Letters, Aug. 28) says, "Jesus never spoke about homosexuality—not one word." If we believe in the Trinity, and that the Bible is the Word of God, then is it not also a part of Christ Himself? God's Word speaks clearly with regard to all forms of sexual immorality in Romans 1:18-32. Romans 1:26-27 refer specifically to homosexual acts. I don't see how homosexuals can have faith in God when the sin they are committing is in defiance of God's Word (I Corinthians 6:12-20).

Homosexuality is a sin, and God will not tolerate sin. Let's not be deceived by our own lusts or Satan's lies, but instead let's cling to God's Word.

Wendy Whittaker,
South Surrey, B.C.

A time for compassion

A few weeks ago, headlines told the shocking story of a 21 year-old gay student from the University of Wyoming who died after being whipped and tied to a fencepost in near freezing temperatures. Reactions to his death ranged from calls for tougher anti-hate legislation to a placard touting "No tears for queers".

That very week we received a letter from South Calgary Inter-Mennonite church stating that all three Mennonite and MB conferences had asked the church to voluntarily withdraw in light of its publicly affirming attitude toward homosexuals.

Our family lived in Calgary 1994-1996 and was a part of that church. Over the past several years, SCIM has followed a progressive but silent course around the issue of homosexuality. Several openly gay members have been welcomed into full participation in the life of the church. Recently, the church took the public step of joining the Supportive Congregations Network. It was that action which led to all the conferences asking for SCIM's withdrawal.

Members of the Mennonite Parent Support Group (for parents of homosexuals) were excluded from full participation at the recent convention of the Conference of Mennonites in Canada. The convention called for more dialogue on the issue, but how can dialogue occur when proponents of one side are removed from the conference?

We strongly support of South Calgary's decision to publicly welcome homosexuals. Through our personal relationships with several gay and lesbian people, we have seen firsthand their sincere desire to serve God, and the honourable nature of their loving, committed relationships. We are pleased to see that South Calgary is refusing to voluntarily withdraw from the conferences.

Peter and Cheryl Farris-Manning, (E)
Nepean, Ont.

Freedom due to others' courage

Should Mennonite Brethren not celebrate Remembrance Day?

1. We ought to be thankful to God for the freedom we have enjoyed as Mennonite brethren from political and military persecution here in Canada, due largely to the willingness of courageous men and women (including many Mennonites) to serve in our armed forces. As David says in the Psalms, God has delivered us from our enemies.

2. As citizens of Canada, it is our responsibility to serve in whatever capacity we can to protect our land. My grandparents embraced citizenship in this safe, supportive country, having escaped, with God's mercy, ruthless regimes in Russia. Many Mennonites accepted the responsibility of citizenship by serving during the World Wars in supportive non-combative roles; we ought to celebrate that along with the unselfish acts of the thousands of Canadians who died to protect what we as Mennonites hold dear.

3. As believers, we should place our priority on living as a Christians. That we have a rich Mennonite heritage and are members of a Mennonite Brethren church are secondary. We all know Jesus told us to love our enemies, while at the same time God commanded the Israelites to go to war for His cause. We Mennonites need to place our personal opinions and church rules aside in favour of God's leading and wisdom. Like the apostle Paul, we must be willing to test our opinions against the Scriptures.

4. It is completely wrong to tar our selfless servicemen and servicewomen with the same brush as tyrants from the past. Our military people here in Canada fought, died and served for us.

Edward M. Warkentin, (E)
Langley, B.C.

We enjoy the freedom

Years ago, I wondered if it was appropriate to wear poppies to church as I didn't see them in the pews around me. I am writing to outline why I choose to wear my poppy.

I agree that "there is nothing in war to celebrate". I am thankful that our Confession of Faith stresses our need to be reconciling agents in all relationships and to follow Christ's example to love our enemies. Violence (in war or otherwise) is contrary to Christ's gospel of love and peace. I don't wear my poppy to symbolize victory in war. Rather, I am acknowledging the lives of the men and women who fought for the freedom that I now enjoy. Thousands lost lives; several thousand more are living with disabilities, painful reminders of how horrible war is.

Brad Hagkull,
Chilliwack, B.C.

Prayer begins new ventures

Shortly after reading about the death of missionary Alvin Voth (Deaths, Sept. 11; News, Sept. 25), I came across some notes I had made years ago of a testimony he gave. It may have been at MB Bible College in the 1950s.

He mentioned that he had carried an experience with him throughout life. On his first day of school, he had been up early, eager to begin this new experience. Before he left for school with his older brothers, his mother drew him gently into another room. There she knelt in prayer, asking God to keep His protecting hand upon her boy, not only on this day but throughout his school career. She did not know what experiences he might face in school. She did know that up to this moment she had done her best, and now she committed her child to God and His keeping.

On another occasion, when he had to stay home from school to help with the farm work, he was about to take a team of horses to the fields. His father called to him and said, "Your mother and I have made it a practice that before we do any new thing, we bring it before God in prayer." So there beside the team of horses, they knelt and prayed.

On this same page of notes I have the testimony of another person who said one of the influences on his life had been his grandmother. He came from a family of boys, and whenever the family car left the driveway with the boys in it for town, they knew their grandmother, who lived on the same yard, would be praying that they might be kept from yielding to temptation. This knowledge kept them from much evil and sinful ways.

Katie Funk Wiebe, (E)
Wichita, Kansas

Articles give integrity

What excellent peace stories (Oct. 23)! The three feature articles give integrity to the biblical command to "love your enemies". The "upside down kingdom" is possible after all, changing the enemy into a citizen of God's Kingdom. "Following Yeshua's Path" gives us much reason and motivation for praying for an enduring peace in the Middle East. Thank you also for "C.S. Lewis 100" by Walter Unger, and the thoughtful poem, "War", by Leanne Coward.

George H. Epp, (E)
Chilliwack, B.C.

Leadership to be qualitative

John Redekop should be affirmed for advancing good information to younger leaders who do not have his experience (Nov. 6).

The team player concept was Henry Schmidt's theme during a recent weekend conference. He did not compare it either the elder or council model. His definition was: "Ready, willing, and able to lead or follow when needed and called upon." If leadership is qualitative—meaning spiritual, and positive in every way, even though it is not identified by either of the traditional ways--it should be valued and implemented.

R. Hiebert, (E)
Abbotsford, B.C.

Power imbalance

Re Asher Intrater's article on reconciliation between Arabs and Jews (Oct. 23). I work with MCC in the Gaza Strip and I am sceptical that true reconciliation can occur when there exists such a fundamental power imbalance between the two groups. Israel has committed gross and frequent injustices against the Palestinians, and the North American Christian community is complicit in these acts by their silence and their acceptance of the view of the the pro-Israeli lobby. I urge Christians to dig beneath the surface myths surrounding the conflict. Intrater mentioned that justice for Jews includes "regaining all the land back for our people so that we have a safe place to live." This is exactly the desire of most Palestinians. As long as the Christian community continues to allow land confiscation, state-endorsed torture of Palestinians, settlement expansion, house demolition and state-sponsored terrorism in the Occupied Territories and Southern Lebanon, reconciliation will be a foolish dream. I urge all Christians who believe in a God of justice to call on Israel to end its occupation of Arab land, its subjugation of the inhabitants and its discrimination against its Arab citizens. Only then will reconciliation become possible.

Mark Schneidereit, (E)
Gaza City, Palestine

Photo gives wrong image

Thank you for "Following Yeshua's Path" (Oct. 23). At first glance, I enjoyed the photo you chose, especially since my wife and I had just been in Israel. The photo is typical of the wilderness surrounding Jerusalem; we stopped to watch the Bedouin and their herds just as in the picture. On second thought, the picture does not belong with the article. It reinforces the cliché that Palestine was empty wilderness with a few Bedouin nomads when Israel occupied it. The 1.5 million refugees in Gaza and the West Bank are not Bedouin nomads but Palestinians who were forced from 700 organized villages and connected farms. Unfortunately, many North America Christians think of Palestine in terms of the picture you printed when the picture should have been one of bombed-out villages and illegal Jewish settlements.

I admire the courageous exploration of issues in the Herald. The Herald is much better than just denominational propaganda. Again, many thanks for doing excellent work.

Edwin Hintz,
Vancouver, B.C.

Direction needed

Thank you for the editorial of Oct. 23.

In the past, we Mennonite Brethren considered the "sign gifts" (healing, tongues and prophecy) as specific gifts that were given to the disciples for verification that their message was a direct message from God. This was necessary at that time because the Bible was not yet completed. Today, since we have the complete Word of God, there is no further need for these sign gifts. So why is it that some of our churches/pastors state that these sign gifts are for us today? What has changed? Have we received new revelation", was there misinterpretation in the past, or are we permitting the theology of men like Kenneth Copeland, John Wimber or C. Peter Wagner to change our interpretation of the Scriptures?

A second biblical issue to which we need to respond is worship. What does "worship" mean? Is it singing, clapping, drama and a brief positive topical message? It has also been suggested by some that dancing may be part of worship, citing the example of David when "he danced before the Lord". If we follow that line of thinking, should we not also include feast celebrations and the offering of animal sacrifices in our worship services? This was part of the Old Testament worship services. But surely this does not apply for us today, or then Christ's sacrifice on the cross would be in vain.

Is there anybody within the MB Conference who would and could give direction in this matter?

A.M. Klassen, (E)
Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont.

Questions for clergy

I have two questions. First, is homosexuality right or wrong? The KJ Version of the Bible is very clear that it is sin but I hear that some churches have homosexuals preaching. If they have found God, then no problem; if not and if they carry out their old lifestyle, then it's a sin.

Second, we see on TV all the floods with people drowned. These people had no chance to give God their lives, especially the children. We hear of our loving God who healed the sick, raised the dead, etc. How do we look at all this? What kind of answer can we come up with?

E.H Thompson
St. Catharines, Ont.

Apprenticeship needed

Re Reuben Pauls's "Leadership: Where To From Here?" (Nov. 6). I'm the solo pastor of a small remote MB church. I've been flirting with thoughts not just of resignation but of an entirely new career. One reason I haven't courted this idea more seriously is that I have come to love this town and its people. Another reason is the seven years I spent getting here: four years in Bible college and three years in graduate school.

Pauls touches on education as a possible reason for our problem with keeping pastors. I wish he would have pursued it further. One of the major causes of my frustration is that I was not prepared for this job! Bible college and graduate school taught me to run programs and impart information, not to relate with common people.

A former schoolmate of mine in Bible college and graduate school went on to do a Ph.D. in biblical studies, while I came here to preach the Bible. Now he has been hired by our first alma mater as a professor, training pastors! If a person wants to be an electrician, he must apprentice four years under a seasoned electrician. If a person wants to be a doctor, she must prove herself under a mature practitioner. If a person wants to be a pastor, that person must spend time training under a green academic?!

My friend did one or two church internships and served in a church for a full year, but that could hardly have prepared him for the complexities of long-term ministry. Other professors had more ministry experience, but the structures of both my alma maters never allowed me to benefit deeply from their experiences. In other words, I was never placed into an ongoing, mentoring relationship with a seasoned and sympathetic pastor who stood beside me as I faced the frustrations of ministry, the obstacles to spiritual leadership and the difficulties of building relationships. Pauls also touches on the issue of mentoring. Again, I wish he would have pursued it further.

In my heart, I know that a new career would just be a band-aid solution. What I really crave is a sense that I'm a member of a team, not just an afterthought. What I really desire is an understanding ear that will listen, not just when it's too late. I guess I'm still looking for one or two "Pauls".

"Timothy"

Note: For clarification, neither of the schools attended by this letter writer were Mennonite Brethren. Ed.

Article provokes

I am sorry that some have such painful memories that they can’t keep Remembrance Day. To me, Remembrance Day is not a glorification of war but a day to honour those who gave their lives for our country, to remember the victims, to thank God that those wars are past and to pray for world peace.

E.F. Hamm,
Penticton, B.C.

Family died

Re "Do Mennonite Brethren not celebrate Remembrance Day?"(Oct. 23). My two oldest brothers were killed in Italy in 1944; one was 26, the other 24. I was six years old when the first telegram was delivered to my mother. She took the message, read it and collapsed. Two days later, the second telegram came. She cried and refused to accept it.

In the movie Saving Private Ryan, both jobs my brothers did were mentioned--medic and courier. My brothers did not volunteer to go to war. They were conscripted.

To our church's credit, an emphasis on peace was mentioned in our church last Sunday.

Should we not stand beside our brothers and sisters who have suffered and died in order to give us freedom?

Cal Dahmer,
Cambridge, Ont.

Lived through the war

As my parents and I lived through the Second World War in the Netherlands, we do remember. Sure, many ugly things happened during these years. But let us not forget the sacrifice that many men gave to allow us to live and worship in freedom. We cannot forget the bad, but we are to forgive our enemies. It is better to flee than to shoot, but we cannot flee from Matthew 4:44 and Matthew 6:14-15. Is this why we Mennonite Brethren don't observe Remembrance Day? I hope not.

Stewart Folkeringa,
Leamington, Ont.

Does not promote unity

"Do Mennonite Brethren not celebrate Remembrance Day?" Oct. 23) does little to promote unity in our denomination, which is comprised of those whose parents or grandparents served in World Wars I and II and those whose family members did not.

I do not know of any denomination which celebrates Remembrance Day. Those of us who go to the park on Remembrance Day do not go to celebrate. At the cenotaph in White Rock, my children and I saw no evidence of jubilation. We saw a ross-section of Canadians reflecting on the tragedy of war and remembering those from our community who never returned to their families. In the CBC coverage of Remembrance Day ceremonies in Ottawa, we also failed to see a celebratory atmosphere; the service was a sombre one of mourning—precisely the mood Mr. Fehr believes should characterize such proceedings.

Out of respect for those who gave their lives, we should wear a poppy and attend Remembrance Day services next November. Their sacrifice secured our freedom to express a personal view in a religious periodical.

J. Schellenberg,
South Surrey, B.C.

Male voices dominate

It is amusing to note the continued dominance of the male voice in the MB Herald. Twelve of 13 named writers in the Nov. 6 issue are male. Is your supposed readership not 50% or more female? It would be interesting to discover how many of those female members who receive the Herald, throw it in the recycling bin unread, as does the one at this address. For shame! Less than 9% of the material reflects the female voice. How long, Lord, how long?

Ruth Wood,
Winnipeg, Man.


Return to the M.B.Herald Vol. 37, No. 24 Home Page